Product

Who We Serve

Partners

Case Studies

Resources

Request a demo

ARTICLE

ABA

Author:

Brellium

How to Handle Insurance Payment Review: A Step-by-Step Guide [+ Templates]

Did you know that healthcare providers lose an average of $5 million annually due to improper payment reviews and denied claims?

The complexity of insurance payment reviews can feel overwhelming, especially when your practice's financial health hangs in the balance. Each review requires meticulous documentation, precise timing, and careful attention to detail - one small oversight could result in significant revenue loss.

Fortunately, handling payment reviews doesn't have to be a source of stress or financial drain. With the right approach and proper documentation systems in place, you can navigate these reviews confidently and protect your practice's revenue.

In this comprehensive guide, we'll walk you through the essential steps of handling insurance payment reviews, from initial notification to successful resolution. We'll also provide ready-to-use templates that will streamline your response process and help maximize your approval rates. Let's get started!

Understanding Insurance Payment Reviews

Insurance payment reviews have become increasingly common in the healthcare industry. Before effectively responding to these reviews, it's essential to understand what they are and why they occur.

Types of payment reviews explained

Payment reviews generally fall into three main categories, each with distinct processes and implications:

Prepayment Reviews occur before claims are paid. During this process, the insurance company examines claims and medical records before releasing payment [1]. This type of review is typically triggered when a provider has a history of claims errors or when payers detect anomalies in billing patterns [2]. Studies show that hospital billing errors occur anywhere from 7% to 75% of the time, making these reviews a critical function for insurers [1].

Post-payment Reviews happen after payment has been made. These reviews can be conducted by various entities including Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPIC), Recovery Auditor Contractors (RAC), and Medicare Administrative Contractors (MAC) [3]. Post-payment reviews primarily look for compliance with coverage, coding, and billing rules. Furthermore, they often target claims with high volumes of services, dramatic frequency changes, or high costs [3].

Targeted Probe and Educate (TPE) Reviews focus on providers with high claim error rates or unusual billing practices [4]. According to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, TPEs are designed to help providers reduce claim denials through one-on-one assistance rather than merely punitive measures.

Why insurers conduct payment reviews

Insurance companies initiate payment reviews for several legitimate reasons:

Error Detection and Correction - Nearly a quarter of Medicare fee-for-service and Medicaid claims were found to be incorrect last year according to the White House Office of Management and Budget [1]. Consequently, insurers use reviews to identify and address these errors.

Financial Responsibility - Payment reviews help control costs by ensuring that only appropriate claims are paid. In fact, settlements and judgments related to false healthcare claims totaled $5 billion in the last fiscal year [1].

Fraud Prevention - Post-payment reviews in particular are meant to "root out fraud, abuse, and waste in the healthcare system" [4]. Rather than simply denying claims, these reviews help maintain the integrity of the insurance system.

Compliance Verification - Insurance companies must verify that claims meet medical necessity requirements and that services aren't being improperly unbundled and billed separately [2].

Common triggers for payment reviews

Several factors can flag a provider for review:

Billing Outliers - Providers who bill more high-level services than others in the same specialty or geographic area [5]
Documentation Inconsistencies - When submitted documentation doesn't properly support the coding used [2]
High Error Rates - Providers with previously identified patterns of incorrect billing [2]
Specific Codes - High reimbursement codes or codes with widespread misuse in the industry [6]
Recent Policy Changes - For instance, when mental health parity laws were reinforced in February 2021, insurance audits increased notably [4]

Understanding the nature of payment reviews is the first step toward managing them effectively. While retrospective reviews have traditionally been the norm, many insurers are now shifting toward prepayment reviews as they create less provider abrasion and tend to generate fewer appeals [1]. Additionally, prepayment reviews allow insurers to spot suspicious billing patterns early, potentially preventing lawsuits and regulatory fines [1].

Preparing for a Payment Review

Proper preparation significantly impacts the outcome of a payment review. Studies show that healthcare providers with organized documentation systems and dedicated review teams are 30% more likely to succeed during insurance audits [7].

Organizing your documentation

Effective documentation management forms the foundation of successful payment review preparation. Initially, develop a system that categorizes your medical records, billing information, and insurance communications. According to experts, insurance tracking is the practice of monitoring and managing policies to ensure they are active and meet specific compliance requirements [8].

Consider these documentation organization steps:

Separate documents into "Reference" and "Current" categories to distinguish between active papers that need immediate attention and those kept for reference [9]
Implement a digital document management system that offers improved searchability, version control, and secure storage [10]
Establish permission-based document access controls to protect confidential information containing personal data [10]
Create a comprehensive audit trail of all user and system activity to ensure accountability [10]

"Managing insurance coverage is a daunting task for most individuals – and can pile up for businesses, too," notes one industry source [8]. Therefore, centralizing and digitizing your documentation eliminates the need for physical storage space and makes retrieval significantly more efficient during payment reviews.

Creating a response team

Forming a dedicated response team is crucial for managing payment reviews efficiently. The team should include members from various departments to ensure comprehensive coverage of all aspects of the review process.

A well-structured response team typically includes:

Billing and coding experts who understand payer-specific requirements
Clinical staff who can explain medical necessity
Administrative personnel who maintain documentation
Legal counsel who can address compliance concerns
Management representatives who oversee the process

"A key practice in preparing for a potential incident is establishing a team that is specifically responsible for responding to security incidents," states one reliable source [11]. After assembling your team, clearly define each member's roles and responsibilities to ensure efficient handling and reporting during reviews [11].

Subsequently, provide regular training for your team members on current coding guidelines, documentation requirements, and review protocols. This training helps prevent common billing errors that might trigger future reviews [12].

Setting up a tracking system

Developing a robust tracking system allows you to monitor submission deadlines, follow up on pending reviews, and document all communications with insurance companies. Automated tracking and reminders are key features of effective insurance tracking software [13].

For optimal tracking results:

Block dedicated time weekly or bi-weekly specifically for claims management [14]
Reconcile financial reports monthly to avoid revenue leakage [14]
Implement software that flags rejected claims for quick correction [14]
Set up auto-reminders for following up on unpaid claims [14]

"Time spent by team members translates to internal resources diverted from revenue-driving activities," notes one industry expert [13]. Although manual tracking is possible, automated systems significantly reduce administrative burden while improving accuracy.

Furthermore, your tracking system should maintain comprehensive records of all interactions with reviewers, including phone calls, emails, and submitted documentation. This detailed record-keeping proves invaluable if you need to file an appeal later in the process.

Leverage Brellium's Payor Request Support

Brellium's Payor Request Support enables provider groups to respond to audits without the headache. Dealing with payor audits can be stressful and time-consuming—but it doesn’t have to be. Simply provide us with the audit details and we’ll compile all the necessary session notes that your payor is requesting.

Responding to the Initial Notification

The moment a payment review notification arrives marks a critical juncture for your practice's revenue cycle. Upon receiving this notification, your response must be swift, thorough, and strategic to protect your financial interests.

Analyzing the review request

When an insurance payment review notification arrives, a careful analysis is your first priority. Insurance companies must provide specific information in their notification letters, including:

The reason your claim or coverage request was denied
Detailed instructions on submission requirements
Key deadlines for submitting your appeal
Your right to file an appeal
Contact information for assistance programs, if available in your state

Immediately check the notification date, as this starts the countdown for your response timeline. Different review types have different deadlines—Medicare requires responses within 30 days for prior authorization reviews, 60 days for services already received, and just 72 hours for urgent care cases.

Review the scope of the audit to determine what specific claims are being reviewed. This helps you assess the potential financial impact and prioritize your response efforts. Additionally, examine whether the review is a prepayment, post-payment, or probe review, as each requires a different approach.

Gathering required documentation

Once you understand the review request, focus on compiling all necessary documentation. Medicare requires that documentation be maintained in supplier files for seven years from the date of service, making proper record-keeping essential.

For most payment reviews, you'll need to provide:

Complete medical records supporting the services provided
Physician orders or prescriptions
Detailed descriptions of items or services delivered
Proof of medical necessity
Any additional information specified in the review notification

Insurance carriers often deny claims due to insufficient documentation. In fact, many errors reported in Medicare audits result from claims submitted with incomplete or missing requisite documentation. Hence, ensure every document is present and properly organized before submission.

Meeting submission deadlines

Timely response is non-negotiable when dealing with payment reviews. Missing deadlines can result in automatic denials and lost revenue. Each payer sets specific timeframes for responses:

Medicare typically allows 30 days for prior authorization reviews and 60 days for services already received. Commercial insurers often provide 30-90 days to respond to a review request. Most post-payment reviews require documentation submission within 30 days of receipt of the request.

Mark these deadlines on your tracking system and set reminders at least one week before they're due. Consider building in a buffer of 3-5 days to account for mail delivery or technical issues with electronic submissions.

Remember that if documentation is not received by the deadline, claims may receive a "technical denial" that could result in recoupment of payments already made. For example, in one audit where 2,000 claims were randomly chosen for review, 594 claims were denied solely because documentation wasn't submitted within the required timeframe.

Send all submissions via trackable methods and maintain proof of timely submission. This evidence becomes crucial if you need to dispute any claims that the payer didn't receive your documentation by the deadline.

Submitting Documentation Effectively

Effective documentation submission stands as the cornerstone of successfully navigating payment reviews. Once you've analyzed the review request and gathered your materials, presenting them properly becomes your next critical step.

Documentation checklist by review type

Different payment review types require specific documentation approaches. Organize your submission based on the review category:

For Prepayment Reviews:

Medical necessity documentation
Complete clinical notes
Physician orders and prescriptions
Detailed service descriptions
Proof of timely submission

For Post-payment Reviews:

All prepayment documents
Claim payment history
Medical records (even those prior to review period)
Copies of previous communications

For Probe Reviews:

Current medical records
Detailed coding justifications
Supporting diagnostic information
Evidence of proper billing practices

Remember that Medicare requires documentation be maintained for seven years from the date of service [15]. Submitting late documentation may still be accepted for "good cause" such as natural disasters or business interruptions [15].

Best practices for record submission

To maximize approval chances, adhere to these submission guidelines:

Attach a copy of the ADR letter as the first page to ensure documentation matches the appropriate patient and claim [15]
Maintain a cordial, business communication tone in all correspondence [16]
Follow up letters with phone calls and document whom you speak to [16]
Avoid assuming one insurance department knows what another is doing [16]
Obtain signed delivery receipts, particularly for time-sensitive submissions [16]
Address submissions to specific individuals rather than generic titles [16]
Submit via trackable methods (esMD, provider portal, fax, or mail) [15]
Complete notes promptly to avoid submission delays [17]
Implement an internal claim scrubbing process to catch errors before submission [17]

Cover letter template

A professional cover letter should accompany all documentation submissions:

[Your Contact Information]
[Date]
[Recipient's Name and Address]

RE: Payment Review Request [Reference/Claim Number]

Dear [Specific Name],

I am responding to your request dated [date] regarding [patient name, claim number, service date]. Enclosed please find the requested documentation supporting the medical necessity and appropriate billing for these services.

The enclosed materials demonstrate [brief explanation of why services were medically necessary and properly coded].

Should you require additional information, please contact me at [phone] or [email].

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Title]

Above all, ensure your submission is complete, accurate, and submitted within the designated timeframe to avoid technical denials.

Navigating the Appeals Process

Despite proper documentation and timely responses, payment reviews sometimes result in denied claims. Under the Affordable Care Act, however, you have the legal right to appeal these decisions through a well-defined process.

When and how to file an appeal

After receiving a denial, you typically have 180 days (6 months) to file an internal appeal with your insurance company [18]. For external reviews, the window narrows to four months after receiving the final determination [18]. Internal appeals for urgent care must be addressed within 72 hours, while non-urgent care appeals allow 30 days for treatments not yet received and 60 days for services already provided [19].

To initiate an appeal, submit a written request to the address specified in your denial notice. Many payers require specific forms that must be completed accurately and legibly [4].

Building a strong appeal case

Effective appeals begin with identifying why the service was denied by reviewing the Claim Adjustment Reason Code (CARC) on your Explanation of Benefits [4]. Next, thoroughly analyze applicable payer policies to determine if exceptions apply.

Key elements for strong appeals include:

A custom cover letter clearly stating what was denied and why it should be covered
Complete medical documentation supporting medical necessity
Relevant policy sections highlighted and attached
A physician statement explaining why treatment was necessary
References to coding manuals or clinical guidelines supporting your position

Importantly, use the payer's own language in your appeal, directly addressing the specific reason for denial [4].

Sample appeal letter template

[Your practice information]
[Date]
[Insurance company address]

RE: Appeal for Claim #[number] - Patient: [name]

Dear [specific name]:

I am appealing your decision dated [date] denying [specific service]. Your denial cited [exact reason from denial letter].

This service meets your coverage requirements because [concise explanation with policy references]. Attached documentation demonstrates [how service meets medical necessity criteria].

Please reconsider this claim based on the enclosed materials. Contact me at [phone/email] with questions.

Sincerely,
[Your name and credentials]

Following up on pending appeals

After submission, diligently track your appeal status. Record all communications with the insurance company, including dates, contact names, and discussion points [4]. If your initial appeal is rejected, you maintain the right to file second-level appeals with additional documentation [4].

Ultimately, if internal appeals are exhausted, you can request an independent external review. This third-party evaluation takes approximately 45 days for standard reviews or 72 hours for expedited cases [18].

Conclusion

Handling insurance payment reviews effectively makes the difference between lost revenue and maintained profitability for healthcare practices. Though these reviews present challenges, a systematic approach significantly improves success rates.

Proper documentation management, dedicated response teams, and robust tracking systems serve as foundational elements for managing reviews successfully. Healthcare providers must stay alert to submission deadlines, maintain thorough records, and respond promptly to information requests.

Remember that denied claims don't mark the end of the road. Understanding appeal rights, timeframes, and requirements allows practices to challenge unfavorable decisions effectively. Through consistent application of these strategies and best practices, healthcare providers can protect their revenue while ensuring compliance with insurance requirements.